Another abandoned server code base... this is kind of an ancestor of taskrambler.
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
 
 
 
 
 
 

427 lines
18 KiB

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" lang="en-US">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
<title>Media Annotations Working Group</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/w3cdoc.css"
type="text/css" media="screen" />
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
href="http://www.w3.org/Guide/pubrules-style.css" />
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
href="http://www.w3.org/2006/02/charter-style.css" />
</head>
<body>
<div id="template">
<ul id="navbar" style="font-size: small">
<li><a href="#scope">Scope</a></li>
<li><a href="#deliverables">Deliverables</a></li>
<li><a href="#coordination">Dependencies and Liaisons</a></li>
<li><a href="#participation">Participation</a></li>
<li><a href="#communication">Communication</a></li>
<li><a href="#decisions">Decision Policy</a></li>
<li><a href="#patentpolicy">Patent Policy</a></li>
<li><a href="#about">About this Charter</a></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://www.w3.org/"><img alt="W3C" height="48"
src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/w3c_home" width="72" /></a> <a class="domainlogo"
href="http://www.w3.org/Interaction/"><img
src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/interaction" alt="Interaction Domain" /></a></p>
<h1 id="title">Media Annotations Working Group Charter</h1>
<p class="mission">The <strong>mission</strong> of the <a
href="/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/">Media Annotations Working Group</a>, part of
the Video in the Web Activity, is to provide an ontology designed to facilitate
cross-community data integration of information related to media objects in the
Web, such as video, audio and images.</p>
<div class="noprint">
<p class="join"><a href="http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/42786/join">Join the
Media Annotations Working Group</a>.</p>
</div>
<table class="summary-table">
<tbody>
<tr id="Duration">
<th rowspan="1" colspan="1">End date</th>
<td rowspan="1" colspan="1">30 June 2011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th rowspan="1" colspan="1">Confidentiality</th>
<td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Proceedings are <a
href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/comm.html#confidentiality-levels">public</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th rowspan="1" colspan="1">Initial Chair</th>
<td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Soohong Daniel Park, Joakim Söderberg</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th rowspan="1" colspan="1">Initial Team Contact <br />
(FTE %: 20)</th>
<td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Thierry Michel</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th rowspan="1" colspan="1">Usual Meeting Schedule</th>
<td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Teleconferences: Weekly <br />
Face-to-face: 3-4 per year</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="scope">
<h2 id="scope">Scope</h2>
<p>This Group is chartered to provide a simple ontology to support
cross-community data integration of information related to media objects on the
Web, as well as an API to access the information. This ontology would help
circumventing the current profileration of video metadata formats by providing
full or partial translation and mapping between the existing formats.</p>
<p>Anticipating the increase in online video and audio in the upcoming years,
it will become progressively more difficult for viewers to find the content
using current search tools. Unlike hypertext documents, it is more complex and
sometimes impossible to deduce meta information about a medium, such as its
title, author, or creation date. An ontology would provide a common set of
terms to define the basic metadata needed for media objects. There has been a
proliferation of media metadata formats. For example, an image could
potentially contain EXIF, IPTC and XMP information. There are several metadata
solutions for media related content, including MPEG-7, IPTC, iTunes XML, Yahoo!
MediaRSS, Video sitemaps, CableLabs VOD Metadata Content, TV-ANytime (ETSI TS
102 822 series), EBU Core Metadata Set, and XMP (see also <a
href="http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/XGR-vocabularies/">Multimedia
Vocabularies on the Semantic Web</a> and the <a
href="http://www.w3.org/2007/08/video/report.html#Metadata">report from the
Video on the Web workshop</a>). The goal of this Group is to develop a
<strong>simple lingua franca</strong> common ontology between the existing
standards, and define a roadmap for future extension of the ontology. It is not
expected that the Group will focus on "low level" metadata in its first phase.
The intent is to help publishers to harmonize metadata information encoded in
different languages but also to help developers with the lack of syntactic and
semantic interoperability. Ultimately, users of the ontology should also be
able to take advantage of Semantic Web technologies, such as the <a
href="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/">SPARQL Query Language for
RDF</a>. The Group should look at the documents produced by the <a
href="http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/">W3C Multimedia Semantics
Incubator Group</a> as a starting point and survey the existing metadata
formats to focus on a specific set. The Group will start by focusing on
discrete/finite simple video objects and will then expand at a later stage into
streamed video, image, and audio.</p>
<p>The Group should explore a minimal approach for specifying proper copyright
licensing, which may require separate terms for specifying the holder of the
copyright and the licensing terms.</p>
<p>The Group will also develop a specification for an application programming
interface (API) to access metadata information. At the minimum, the Group will
provide a simple client-side readonly ECMAScript API. The Group should also
consider making the underlying media metadata available to a browser ECMAScript
API in some <strong>simple</strong> RDF form, especially as a number of the
underlying data formats permit full RDF. Such access should be able to operate
on metadata elements defined in future versions of the simple common ontology;
that is, it should not be designed such that extensions are required when the
common ontology is extended.</p>
<p>The Group may hold Workshops, Interoperability Meetings, and other events as
required to fulfill its mission.</p>
<h3>Success Criteria</h3>
<ul>
<li>Abilitity to convert core metadata information from one metadata standard
to an other</li>
<li>Development of a set of requirements and competency questions to
determine the scope of the ontology and to test the fulfillment of the
requirements and coverage of the ontology.</li>
<li>Production of stable documents addressing the work items listed in the <a
href="#deliverables">Deliverables</a> section.</li>
<li>Availability of at least two implementations mapping the ontology
developed by the Group with two other existing metadata standards, as
demonstrated by an implementation report (summarizing implementation status
against the relevant test suite) for each testable class of product,
including user agents</li>
<li>Availability of at least two implementations for the API
specification(s).</li>
<li>Demonstrate that the "most commonly used" metadata items in use by the
industry are mapped by the ontology.</li>
</ul>
<div>
<h3>Out of Scope</h3>
<p>Full coverage of all metadata elements in EXIF, IPTC, XMP, MPEG-7, and
similar broad vocabularies, is out of scope, as well as signal related
descriptors.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<h2 id="deliverables">Deliverables</h2>
<div id="rec-deliverables">
<h3>W3C Technical Reports</h3>
<ul>
<li>A W3C Working Group Note for use cases and requirements for the Media
Ontology</li>
<li>A W3C Recommendation describing a <em>simple</em> ontology for
representating a set of concepts often associated with media objects.</li>
<li>A W3C Recommendation for an application programming interface (API) to
access metadata information.</li>
<li>A W3C Working Group Note for mapping the ontology to existing standards
and solutions.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div id="ig-other-deliverables">
<h3>Other Deliverables</h3>
<ul>
<li>Collection of a corpus of metadata to demonstrate the mapping and
translation.</li>
<li>Implementation and interoperability reports.</li>
<li>Tutorial or primer resources (if suitable and if resources are
available).</li>
<li>Propose eventually a new charter for follow on work.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<h3>Milestones</h3>
<table class="roadmap" width="80%">
<caption>Milestones</caption>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th rowspan="1" colspan="1">Specification</th>
<th rowspan="1" colspan="1"><acronym
title="First Working Draft">FPWD</acronym></th>
<th rowspan="1" colspan="1"><acronym
title="Last Call Working Draft">LC</acronym></th>
<th rowspan="1" colspan="1"><acronym
title="Candidate Recommendation">CR</acronym></th>
<th rowspan="1" colspan="1"><acronym
title="Proposed Recommendation">PR</acronym></th>
<th rowspan="1" colspan="1"><acronym
title="Recommendation">Rec</acronym></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th rowspan="1" colspan="1">Ontology for Media Object Use Cases and
Requirements</th>
<td class="WD1" rowspan="1" colspan="1">October 2008</td>
<td class="LC" rowspan="1" colspan="1">March 2009</td>
<td class="CR" rowspan="1" colspan="1"></td>
<td class="PR" rowspan="1" colspan="1"></td>
<td class="REC" rowspan="1" colspan="1"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th rowspan="1" colspan="1">Ontology for Media Object 1.0</th>
<td class="WD1" rowspan="1" colspan="1">February 2009</td>
<td class="LC" rowspan="1" colspan="1">June 2009</td>
<td class="CR" rowspan="1" colspan="1">September 2009</td>
<td class="PR" rowspan="1" colspan="1">December 2009</td>
<td class="REC" rowspan="1" colspan="1">January 2010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th rowspan="1" colspan="1">API for Media Object 1.0</th>
<td class="WD1" rowspan="1" colspan="1">February 2009</td>
<td class="LC" rowspan="1" colspan="1">June 2009</td>
<td class="CR" rowspan="1" colspan="1">September 2009</td>
<td class="PR" rowspan="1" colspan="1">December 2009</td>
<td class="REC" rowspan="1" colspan="1">January 2010</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<!--
<div class="should">
<h3 id="timeline">Timeline View Summary</h3>
<p class="toadd">TODO</p>
<ul class="example">
<li>September 2008: First teleconference</li>
<li>October 2008: First face-to-face meeting</li>
<li>October 2008: Requirements and Use Cases for Ontology</li>
<li>October 2008: FPWD for FooML</li>
<li>: Requirements and Use Cases for BarML</li>
<li>Month YYYY: FPWD FooML Primer</li>
</ul>
</div>
-->
</div>
<div class="dependencies">
<p>Note: the Working Group homepage contains an <a
href="http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/#Schedule">updated
schedule</a>.</p>
<h2 id="coordination">Dependencies and Liaisons</h2>
<p>As part of the Video in the Web Activity, the Media Annotation Working Group
will be represented in the Hypertext Coordination Group. </p>
<h3>Dependencies with W3C Groups</h3>
<dl>
<dt>Semantic Web Deployment Working Group</dt>
<dd>The mission of this Working Group is to provide guidance in the form of
W3C Technical Reports on issues of practical RDF development and
deployment practices in the areas of publishing vocabularies, OWL usage,
and integrating RDF with HTML documents.</dd>
<dt>Semantic Web Coordination Group</dt>
<dd>The Semantic Web Coordination Group serves as an advisory forum for the
W3C Semantic Web Activity. Assuming the Semantic Web Deployment and
POWDER Working Groups finish in December 2008, the Coordination Group
will be use a fallback to ensure proper dependencies with the Semantic
Web Activity. </dd>
<dt>Scalable Vector Graphics Working Group (SVG)</dt>
<dd>SVG is a language for describing two-dimensional graphics and graphical
applications in XML. </dd>
<dt>Web Applications (WebApps) Working Group</dt>
<dd>The mission of this Group is to develop standard APIs for client-side
Web Application development. </dd>
<dt>HyperText Markup Language (HTML) Working Group</dt>
<dd>The mission of the HTML Working Group is to continue the evolution of
HTML (including classic HTML and XML syntaxes). </dd>
</dl>
<h3>Liaisons with W3C Groups</h3>
<dl>
<dt>Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER) Working Group</dt>
<dd>The POWDER Working Group is specifying a protocol for publishing
descriptions of (e.g. metadata about) Web resources using RDF, OWL, and
HTTP.</dd>
<dt>Protocols and Formats Working Group</dt>
<dd>The PFWG looks at the formal Web technologies (protocols, formats,
etc.) from an accessibility perspective. </dd>
</dl>
<div>
<h3>External Groups</h3>
<dl>
<dt>ISO/IEC JTC-1/SC-29 WG 11 Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG)</dt>
<dd>This group is developing standards for coded representation of digital
audio and video, including MPEG-7 and MPEG-21. </dd>
<dd></dd>
<dt>The Internet Captioning Forum (ICF)</dt>
<dd>This organization addresses the technical challenges presented by
online video repurposed from broadcast or other previously captioned
sources, as well as video created specifically for the Web.</dd>
<dt>International Press Telecommunications Council (IPTC)</dt>
<dd>The International Press Telecommunications Council (IPTC), developing
technical standards for improved news exchange that are used by virtually
every major news organization in the world, such as IPTC Metadata for XMP
(IPTC4XMP).</dd>
<dt>European Broadcasting Union Metadata Advisory Group (P/MAG)</dt>
<dd>The European Broadcasting Union has been developing metadata
specifications related to radio, camcorders, news. </dd>
<dt>International Telecommunication Union (ITU) IPTV Focus Group</dt>
<dd>The mission of FG IPTV is to coordinate and promote the development of
global IPTV standards taking into account the existing work of the ITU
study groups as well as Standards Developing Organizations, Fora and
Consortia. </dd>
<dt>IPTV Forum Japan</dt>
<dd>The mission of the IPTV Forum Japan is to improve the deployement of
IPTV services. </dd>
<dt>International Imaging Industry Association (I3A)</dt>
<dd>I3A is a forum for development and advancement of open standards within
the imaging industry.</dd>
<dt>Picture Licensing Universal System (PLUS)</dt>
<dd>The PLUS Coalition is an international non-profit initiative on a
mission to simplify and facilitate the communication and management of
image rights.</dd>
<dt>Universal Photographic Digital Imaging Guidelines (UPDIG)</dt>
<dd>UPDIG is a a working group of digital imaging professionals and allied
trade groups and manufacturers, dedicated to promoting worldwide
standards in the commercial application of digital imaging. </dd>
</dl>
</div>
</div>
<div class="participation">
<h2 id="participation">Participation</h2>
<p>To be successful, the Media Annotations Working Group is expected to have 10
or more active participants for its duration. Effective participation to Media
Annotations Working Group is expected to consume one work day per week for each
participant; two days per week for editors. The Media Annotations Working Group
will allocate also the necessary resources for building Test Suites for each
specification.</p>
<p>Participants are reminded of the <a
href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/groups.html#good-standing">Good
Standing requirements</a> of the W3C Process.</p>
</div>
<div class="communication">
<h2 id="communication">Communication</h2>
<p>This group primarily conducts its work on the public mailing list
public-media-annotation@w3.org.</p>
<p>Information about the group (deliverables, participants, face-to-face
meetings, teleconferences, etc.) is available from the Media Annotations
Working Group home page.</p>
</div>
<div class="decisions">
<h2 id="decisions">Decision Policy</h2>
<p>As explained in the Process Document (<a
href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/policies#Consensus">section
3.3</a>), this group will seek to make decisions when there is consensus. When
the Chair puts a question and observes dissent, after due consideration of
different opinions, the Chair should record a decision (possibly after a formal
vote) and any objections, and move on.</p>
<p>This charter is written in accordance with <a
href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/policies#Votes">Section 3.4,
Votes</a> of the W3C Process Document and includes no voting procedures beyond
what the Process Document requires.</p>
</div>
<div class="patent">
<h2 id="patentpolicy">Patent Policy</h2>
<p>This Working Group operates under the <a
href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/">W3C Patent
Policy</a> (5 February 2004 Version). To promote the widest adoption of Web
standards, W3C seeks to issue Recommendations that can be implemented,
according to this policy, on a Royalty-Free basis.</p>
<p>For more information about disclosure obligations for this group, please see
the <a href="http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/">W3C Patent Policy
Implementation</a>.</p>
</div>
<h2 id="about">About this Charter</h2>
<p>This charter for the Media Annotations Working Group has been created
according to <a
href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/groups#GAGeneral">section 6.2</a> of
the <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process">Process Document</a>. In the
event of a conflict between this document or the provisions of any charter and
the W3C Process, the W3C Process shall take precedence.</p>
<p>This charter has been extended on July 7, 2010 until June 30, 2011 (<a
href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2010JulSep/0000.html">announcement</a>);
at this time, the end date, team contact, and chairs information were updated
in this document. </p>
<p></p>
<hr />
<address>
Philippe Le Hégaret, <a href="mailto:plh@w3.org">plh@w3.org</a>
</address>
<p class="copyright"><a rel="Copyright"
href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#Copyright">Copyright</a>©
2008 <a href="http://www.w3.org/"><acronym
title="World Wide Web Consortium">W3C</acronym></a> <sup>®</sup> (<a
href="http://www.csail.mit.edu/"><acronym
title="Massachusetts Institute of Technology">MIT</acronym></a> , <a
href="http://www.ercim.org/"><acronym
title="European Research Consortium for Informatics and Mathematics">ERCIM</acronym></a>
, <a href="http://www.keio.ac.jp/">Keio</a>), All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>$Date: 2010/07/07 21:11:14 $</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>