Another abandoned server code base... this is kind of an ancestor of taskrambler.
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
 
 
 
 
 
 

812 lines
30 KiB

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html lang='en' xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en">
<head>
<meta name="generator" content=
"HTML Tidy for Linux/x86 (vers 12 April 2005), see www.w3.org" />
<title>Media Fragments Working Group Teleconference -- 20 Oct
2008</title>
<link type="text/css" rel="STYLESHEET" href=
"http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/base.css" />
<link type="text/css" rel="STYLESHEET" href=
"http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/public.css" />
<link type="text/css" rel="STYLESHEET" href=
"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/minutes-style.css" />
<meta content="Media Fragments Working Group Teleconference"
name="Title" />
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv=
"Content-Type" />
</head>
<body>
<p><a href="http://www.w3.org/"><img src=
"http://www.w3.org/Icons/w3c_home" alt="W3C" border="0" height=
"48" width="72" /></a></p>
<h1>Media Fragments Working Group Teleconference</h1>
<h2>20 Oct 2008</h2>
<p><a href=
'http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/FirstF2FAgenda'>Agenda</a></p>
<p>See also: <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2008/10/20-mediafrag-irc">IRC log</a></p>
<h2><a name="attendees" id="attendees">Attendees</a></h2>
<div class="intro">
<dl>
<dt>Present</dt>
<dd>Iles_C</dd>
<dt>Regrets</dt>
<dt>Chair</dt>
<dd>Erik, Raphael</dd>
<dt>Scribe</dt>
<dd>Jack</dd>
</dl>
</div>
<h2>Contents</h2>
<ul>
<li>
<a href="#agenda">Topics</a>
<ol>
<li><a href="#item01">1. Round of introductions</a></li>
<li><a href="#item02">2. Use Cases Discussion (Part
1)</a></li>
<li><a href="#item03">3. Use Case Discussion (Part
2)</a></li>
<li><a href="#item04">Media Delivery use case</a></li>
</ol>
</li>
<li><a href="#ActionSummary">Summary of Action Items</a></li>
</ul>
<hr />
<div class="meeting">
<p class='phone'>&nbsp;</p>
<p class='phone'>&nbsp;</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>trackbot</cite>&gt; Date: 20 October
2008</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>nessy</cite>&gt; Meeting openend
9:08</p>
<h3 id="item01">1. Round of introductions</h3>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>nessy</cite>&gt; Raphael</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>nessy</cite>&gt; Erik</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; scribenick:
raphael</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Davy:</cite> also in Multimedia Lab,
IBBT, Ghent (BE)</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Silvia:</cite> involved in MPEG-7,
MPEG-21, developed Annodex (annotation format for ogg media
files)<br />
... start my own start up for measuring the audience of video
on the web + consultant for Mozilla<br />
... developped the TemporalURI specification, 6 years ago</p>
<p class='phone'>Guillaume Olivrin, South Africa, focus on
accessibility, how do you attach specific semantics to parts of
media</p>
<p class='phone'>Daniel Park, Samsung, co-chair of the Media
Annotation, focus on IPTV (background in wireless
networking)</p>
<p class='phone'>Andy Heath, Open University, UK, background on
e-learning, but develop far more general technologies, focus on
accessibility</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>scribe:</cite> experience in standards
such as LOM, DC, SKORM</p>
<p class='phone'>Colm Doyle: Blinkx</p>
<p class='phone'>Larry Masinter: Adobe, experience in
co-chairing HTTP group, focus on acquisition of metadata</p>
<p class='phone'>Khang Cham, Samsung, focus on IPTV</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Yves:</cite> W3C team contact, expertise
in protocols, web services</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>nessy</cite>&gt; <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2008/01/media-fragments-wg.html">http://www.w3.org/2008/01/media-fragments-wg.html</a></p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>nessy</cite>&gt; ... working group
charter</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Larry:</cite> important to define first
requirements for why these URIs will be used for<br />
... it might happen that you can not satisfy all the
requirements with a URI, don't put that out of scope now</p>
<h3 id="item02">2. Use Cases Discussion (Part 1)</h3>
<p class='phone'>Photo Use Case: <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Use_Cases_%26_Requirements#Photobook_UC">
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Use_Cases_%26_Requirements#Photobook_UC</a></p>
<p class='phone'>Slides at: <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/meetings/2008-10-20-f2f_cannes/photobook_UC.pdf">
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/meetings/2008-10-20-f2f_cannes/photobook_UC.pdf</a></p>
<p class='phone'>Erik goes through the slides</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Erik:</cite> take parts of images ...
and assemble them together in a slideshow</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Guillaume:</cite> unclear the value of
the fragments here<br />
... I understand fragment as taking a part of a large thing</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Larry:</cite> is it worth at all to look
at Spatial URIs? Is it for doing partial retrieval?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> mention maps
applications</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Larry:</cite> but they are
intereactive!</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> mention multi-resolution
images, image industry has huge need and will to expose high
resolution version of images</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Larry:</cite> they do have JPEG2000 and
protocols</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Silvia:</cite> SMIL has ellaborate on
the need for spatial fragments</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jack:</cite> important needs in the SMIL
community and SVG ... image maps, pan zoom, cropping</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Erik:</cite> continues the presentation,
after temporally assemble parts of images into a slideshow,
assemble two parts of an image into a new one (stich)<br />
... Existing technologies: RSS and Atom for the playlist
generation<br />
... W3C SMIL: XML-based markup language, requires a SMIL
player<br />
... MPEG-21: Part 17 for fragment identification of MPEG
Ressources, client-side processing ... pseudo playlist<br />
... MPEG-A: MAF (Media Application Format) that combines MPEG
technologies<br />
... XSPF (spiff): XML Shareable Playlist Format: Xiph
Community<br />
... Discussion: is it out of scope or not? specific use cases
around? other technologies around?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Guillaume:</cite> unclear the value of
the fragments here<br />
... I understand fragment as taking a part of a large thing</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Silvia:</cite> we are mainly looking at
audio and videos files, but a video is a sequence of images</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Larry:</cite> there are different
servers and clients</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Silvia:</cite> one way to look at a
criteria is: is it a pure client-side issue or server-side +
client-side problems?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Larry:</cite> even if it is only a
client-side issue, it might be worth to do some
standardisation<br />
... the main point of still images fragment is the
interactivity</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> is interactivity the key
interest in spatial fragment</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Larry:</cite> there is a lot of work in
this area, would recommend to focus on the temporal issue<br />
... it is also a good exercise to look at the out-of-scope use
case, help to shape the scope</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jack:</cite> URI is good because it is
the web, the client is not necessarily aware of the time
dimension<br />
... HTML has already a notion of Area, so don't encode it in a
URI</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Larry:</cite> need to be carreful on
URIs, resources, representations<br />
... example of an image: need to decode it, take the parts,
re-encode it<br />
... JPEG2000 might have a direct way to do that</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Guillaume:</cite> create mosaic, collage
of parts of media</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Yves:</cite> it depends if the
transformation needs to be on the client or not</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jack:</cite> be carreful, to not put SVG
in a URI :-)<br />
... good balance on which processing can be on client side, and
what is worth to put in a URL<br />
... is it better to have the processing in the URL?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Erik:</cite> we question again the
interest of the spatial fragment</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Silvia:</cite> is it a question of the
size of the media? Large: worth to have fragment, Small: not
worth</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Larry:</cite> define what do you mean by
media<br />
... it is reasonable to limit yourself to videos</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Silvia:</cite> SMIL and Flash are
interactive media, not necessarily one timeline<br />
... we focus on a resource with one timeline<br />
... there is a whole sweat of codecs issues</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Larry:</cite> define markers in
videos</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>Yves</cite>&gt; time... what is the
reference of time for a video, embedded time code? 0 for the
start?</p>
<p class='phone'>Coffee break</p>
<p class='phone'>Map Use Case: <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Use_Cases_%26_Requirements/Map_Application_UC">
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Use_Cases_%26_Requirements/Map_Application_UC</a></p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>scribe</cite>&gt; scribenick: erik</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> Map UC Description</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>nessy</cite>&gt; <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Use_Cases_%26_Requirements">
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Use_Cases_%26_Requirements</a></p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> Annotation is key</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>Kangchan</cite>&gt; Question : What is
relation between Geolocation Working Group(with <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2008/geolocation/)">http://www.w3.org/2008/geolocation/)</a>
and Web Map Services</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> UC examples using Yahoo,
Google &amp; Microsoft</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jack:</cite> what we see here are URI's
for the applications, not images</p>
<p class='phone'>Raphael will look deeper into different specs
over the next couple of weeks for this Map UC</p>
<p class='phone'>Davy &amp; Jack: is this a valid UC? will our
spatial URL adressing scheme will be used by Maps
Applications?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> as Larry said this
morning, out-of-scope UC's are valid to come up with our final
WG's scope</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>guillaume</cite>&gt; Must document the
out of scope UC&nbsp;to explain why it is out of scope.</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Sylvia:</cite> there might be a UC when
we are talking about really large images (cfr. medical images
in really high resolutions)<br />
... having a way to get a subpart of such a big image is nice
to have, but implementation is something different ... a lot of
complications, certainly on some server-side
implimentations</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Guillaume:</cite> codec issues not to be
underestimated, have a nice adressing scheme vs. server-side
complexity</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Sylvia:</cite> should look further than
just server-side complexity, solutions for certain codecs will
come around eventually if needed</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jack:</cite> pratical issues vs.
fundamental issues have to be taken into account within this
group<br />
... media fragments are needed because some things can not be
expressed today</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> is it worth of having an
overview of the TimedText WG?</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>nessy</cite>&gt; Guillaume: URI
fragment identifier for text/plain: <a href=
"http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5147.txt">http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5147.txt</a></p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>Yves</cite>&gt; (multi-resolution
formats, <a href=
"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FlashPix">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FlashPix</a>
is a good example of a single file containing multiple
resolutions, maybe better than the map application)</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> Zoomify is good example
of UC of very big images (life sciences) using fragments<br />
... task of this group to ensure interoperability of different
standards? (eg. MPEG-21 URI to SVG)</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Sylvia:</cite> defining the mappings
should be out-of-scope for this WG</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jack:</cite> worthwile is testing our
scheme to the others out there</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Sylvia:</cite> last thing to do &amp;
should be straight forward by then if we did a good job</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> what about spatial
dimension?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Sylvia:</cite> temporal adressing need
is biggest, but spatial adressing need is also valid</p>
<h3 id="item03">3. Use Case Discussion (Part 2)</h3>
<p class='phone'>Sylvia presenting the Media Annotation UC</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Use_Cases_%26_Requirements#Media_Annotation_UC">
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Use_Cases_%26_Requirements#Media_Annotation_UC</a></p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; Silvia: Annotation
can be attached to the full media resource or to fragments of
media resources</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; scribenick:
raphael</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Sylvia:</cite> annotations to fragment
is relevant for this group</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Guillaume:</cite> can the structure of
the video be represented in the URI</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Silvia:</cite> difference between the
representation of the fragment and its semantics</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>spark3</cite>&gt; if necessary, what
about adding a new UC (naming use case for fragment) into the
Media Annotation WG UC ?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Silvia:</cite> drawing on the board</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>erik</cite>&gt; Jack: there's only 1
timeline for timed media</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>erik</cite>&gt; Jack: there's only 1
coordinate system for spatial media</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>erik</cite>&gt; Jack: Annotation UC is
important because we're reasoning on a higher abstraction
level</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jack:</cite> loves that use case since
it is purely about fundamental description and indexing of a
media</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Silvia:</cite> goes through the
advantages of a possible URI scheme for media fragments<br />
... actually motivating the need for media fragments<br />
... shows the picture at <a href=
"https://wiki.mozilla.org/Image:Video_Fragment_Linking.jpg">https://wiki.mozilla.org/Image:Video_Fragment_Linking.jpg</a><br />
... jumps into the track problems<br />
... there is actually 3 dimensions: space, time and track<br />
... temporalURI just deal with cropping, no track awareness</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jack:</cite> rename this use case into
'Anchoring'<br />
... annotation = RDF community<br />
... structuring = SMIL community</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Silvia:</cite> agree to rename it into
Media Anchor Definition</p>
<p class='phone'>Lunch break</p>
<p class='phone'>Media Delivery Use Case: <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Use_Cases_%26_Requirements#Media_Delivery_UC">
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Use_Cases_%26_Requirements#Media_Delivery_UC</a></p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>scribe</cite>&gt; scribenick: Jack</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>Yves</cite>&gt; Scribe: Jack</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>jackjansen</cite>&gt; scribenick:
jackjansen</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; scribenick:
jackjansen</p>
<h3 id="item04">Media Delivery use case</h3>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; Davy going through
the slide at: <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/meetings/2008-10-20-f2f_cannes/media_delivery_UC.pdf">
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/meetings/2008-10-20-f2f_cannes/media_delivery_UC.pdf</a></p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Various:</cite> (discussing slide 3, #
vs. ? or ,): Can we use # as the only user-visible marker and
use http-ranges or something similar?</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; Silvia drawing a
communication channel between UA and servers</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; Discussion about
the use of the "hash" character</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; Yves: use case is
to extract a frame of a video, and creates a new image (so a
new resource), use a '?'</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; ... use case is to
keep the context, use a '#'</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; Summary: there is
use cases for both, should be further discussed tomorrow
morning</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>summary:</cite> there are use cases for
both. We will get back to the subject tomorrow.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>guillaume</cite>&gt; dejà vue</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; Davy: explains the
MPEG-21 Fragment identification</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; ... use of the '#',
but no delivery protocol</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; ... mention also
the proposal of Dave Singer: UA get first N bytes representing
the headers with timing and bytes offset information of the
media resource</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; ... goes through an
explanation of MPEG-21: <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/State_of_the_Art#MPEG-21_Part_17:_Fragment_Identification_of_MPEG_Resources_.28Davy_.2F_Silvia.29">
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/State_of_the_Art#MPEG-21_Part_17:_Fragment_Identification_of_MPEG_Resources_.28Davy_.2F_Silvia.29</a></p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; ... 4 schemes</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; ... ffp for the
track</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; ... offset for
bytes range</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>all:</cite> discussing #mp() scheme</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; ... mp for
specifying the temporal or spatial fragment (only for MPEG
mime-type resources)</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>sylvia:</cite> whoever controls the
mimetype also controls what is after the # in a url</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jack:</cite> is surprised, but
pleasantly so.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; Davy: the 4th
scheme is 'mask' (only for MPEG resources)</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; Jack: seems they
structure the video resource and point towards this
structure</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; Raphael: how many
user agents can understand this syntax?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>all:</cite> none, that we know of</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; Davy: i'm not aware
of ... altough there is a referenced implementation</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; Larry: http is not
necessarily the best protocol to transport video</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>Yves</cite>&gt; in video, it depends
if you want exact timing, control of the lag, and in that case
HTTP is not the best choice</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; Silvia: I would say
that most of the videos is transported over http</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; ... RTP and RTSP
have their own fragments, we should learn from them</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; ... if they do not
satisfy all our requirements, we can feed them so they extend
the use of fragments in these protocols</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; Davy: goes through
TemporalURI</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; ... this is the
only that specifies a delivery protocol over http</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Silvia:</cite> Real used to allow
something similar to temporal URLs</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jack:</cite> thinks it may be part of
the .ram files</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Guillaume:</cite> Flash allows doc
author to export subparts by name, these can then be accessed
with url#name</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Davy:</cite> continues with slide 6,
http media delivery</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>guillaume</cite>&gt; Guillaume: Flash
could also embed internal links in movie attached to certain
frames. Once compiled with specific option, fragment of the
Flash movie could be accessed using #</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; Silvia: draw the
four-way handshake</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; ... 1st exchange:
User requests <a href=
"http://www.example.com/resource.ogv#t=20-30">http://www.example.com/resource.ogv#t=20-30</a></p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; ... UA does a GET
&lt;uri stripped of hash&gt;, Range: time 20-30</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; ... Server send
back a Response 200, with the content-range: time 20-30 +
content-type + ogg header + time-range bytes 50000-20000</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; ... (needs to
create a new http header, 'time-range')</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; Raphael: can we use
content-range: bytes ... ?</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; ... UA does a GET
&lt;URI strriped of the hash&gt;, Range x bytes: 5000-20000</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; ... Server send
back a Response 200, with the content-range bytes + the cropped
data</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; Silvia: it is not
implemented yet as far as I know</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; ... discussion
based on a lot of discussions with proxies vendors</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; Davy: could we
apply the same four-way handshake with RTSP?</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; ... RTSP specifies
a Range Header, similar to the HTTP byte range mechanism</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; ... RTSP could
support temporal fragments by a two-way handshake (using Range
header)</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; ... Problem:
spatial fragments are not supported!</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; Jack: the spatial
problem is kind of orthogonal</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; ... the spatial
fragment will not be about bytes range</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; Davy: cropping is
more complex in images</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; Jack: you're right,
I can create a non-continous quicktime movie</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; ... problem is it
is not necessarily possible to generate a byte range from a
time range</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; Silvia: a single
byte range</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>all:</cite> the non-contiguous ranges
may occur more often than we like. But maybe<br />
... we can get away with ignoring them (because all relevant
formats also have a contiguous form).<br />
... need to discuss after the break.</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>raphael:</cite> suggest coffee break</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>guillaume</cite>&gt; or need to
coalesce</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Larry:</cite> please decouple
representation of how you refer to fragments form he
implementations<br />
... Also think about embedded metadata: if the original has a
copyright statement, do you get it wth every fragment?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Sylvia:</cite> (on prev subject):
wonders whether http can do multiple byte ranges</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Larry:</cite> yes, I think so, with
multipart</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>erik</cite>&gt; rssagent, draft
minutes</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>davy</cite>&gt; scribenick: davy</p>
<p class='phone'>Media Linking UC</p>
<p class='phone'>raphael discusses the description written by
Michael on the wiki</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>scribe:</cite> 3 things: bookmarking,
playlists, and interlinking multimedia</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>silvia:</cite> definition of playlists
is out of scope</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>guillaume:</cite> playlist is about
presentation</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>raphael:</cite> regarding interlinked:
temporal URIs can be described in RDF (RDF doc describing an
audio file)<br />
... difference between URI and RDF (or SMIL, or ...): you need
to parse the metadata<br />
... RDF description of time segment could be replaced by a
temporal URI</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>silvia:</cite> interlinking multimedia
is already covered in other UCs</p>
<p class='phone'>Video Browser UC</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>silvia:</cite> large media files
introduces special challenges<br />
... requirement for server-side processing<br />
... dynamic creation of thumbnails through URI mechanism</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>guillaume:</cite> link to PNG or
GIF<br />
... provide a preview function of the resource<br />
... trivial: get all the I-frames of a video resource<br />
... use them as thumbs<br />
... thumbnail extraction is quite easy</p>
<p class='phone'>silvia, jack: not so trivial, might be
processing-intensive</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>silvia:</cite> it should be possible to
point to one single frame with the URI scheme</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>jack:</cite> URI scheme should not know
that frame is 'the' thumbnail</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>guillaume:</cite> you can have multiple
thumbs per resource</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>raphael:</cite> URI scheme can point to
a frame, but does not have knowledge about thumbs<br />
... should we be able to address in terms of frames?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>guillaume:</cite> no, too
coding-specific</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>silvia:</cite> previews of images?<br />
... preview is then a lower resolution image</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>guillaume:</cite> that is
processing<br />
... mostly, previews are already part of the media
resource<br />
... hence lower image resolutions are out of scope</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>jack:</cite> not too far?<br />
... is a preview embedded in a resource still a fragment?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>guillaume:</cite> compare it with
tracks<br />
... preview is just another track</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>raphael:</cite> we put this in mind and
make a decision later</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>silvia:</cite> previews are another sort
of tracks</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>raphael:</cite> should we also to be
able to address metadata within the headers?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>silvia:</cite> it is not a common
property of all the formats to have previews, therefore, it is
not a candidate to be standardized</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>raphael:</cite> after first fase of the
WG: report the current limitations<br />
... and wait for feedback</p>
<p class='phone'>Moving Point Of Interest UC</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>raphael:</cite> complex UC<br />
... should be for the second phase</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>jack:</cite> if this ever to be going to
used at server-side?<br />
... if not, it is out of scope</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>raphael:</cite> you can share the link
of the moving region</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>erik:</cite> delivery to mobile devices
is a use case introduced by the public flemish broadcaster</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>jack:</cite> there is no reason to use
URIs for that purpose, use metadata</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>raphael:</cite> it is like concatenating
spatial fragments over time</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>guillaume:</cite> we are addressing
points over space or time</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>raphael:</cite> refer to HTML image
maps<br />
... region, interval can be defined by a combination of
points<br />
... you need more than one point</p>
<p class='phone'>Issues</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>raphael:</cite> we will discuss this
tomorrow</p>
</div>
<h2><a name="ActionSummary" id="ActionSummary">Summary of Action
Items</a></h2><!-- Action Items -->
[End of minutes]<br />
<hr />
<address>
Minutes formatted by David Booth's <a href=
"http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm">
scribe.perl</a> version 1.133 (<a href=
"http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/">CVS log</a>)<br />
$Date: 2008/10/26 10:50:37 $
</address>
</body>
</html>