Another abandoned server code base... this is kind of an ancestor of taskrambler.
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
 
 
 
 
 
 

1135 lines
42 KiB

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html lang='en' xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en">
<head>
<meta name="generator" content=
"HTML Tidy for Linux/x86 (vers 12 April 2005), see www.w3.org" />
<title>Social Web XG Meeting -- 02 Sep 2009</title>
<link type="text/css" rel="STYLESHEET" href=
"http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/base.css" />
<link type="text/css" rel="STYLESHEET" href=
"http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/public.css" />
<link type="text/css" rel="STYLESHEET" href=
"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/minutes-style.css" />
<meta content="SV_MEETING_TITLE" name="Title" />
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv=
"Content-Type" />
</head>
<body>
<p><a href="http://www.w3.org/"><img src=
"http://www.w3.org/Icons/w3c_home" alt="W3C" border="0" height=
"48" width="72" /></a></p>
<h1>Social Web XG Meeting</h1>
<h2>02 Sep 2009</h2>
<p><a href=
'http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/weekly-agenda.html'>Agenda</a></p>
<p>See also: <a href="http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-irc">IRC
log</a></p>
<h2><a name="attendees" id="attendees">Attendees</a></h2>
<div class="intro">
<dl>
<dt>Present</dt>
<dd>+95177aaaa, rreck, melvster, tinkster, pchampin, DKA,
+1.314.683.aabb, bblfish, caribou, AlexPassant, hhalpin,
Adam, AndreaP</dd>
<dt>Regrets</dt>
<dt>Chair</dt>
<dd>hhalpin</dd>
<dt>Scribe</dt>
<dd>Toby</dd>
</dl>
</div>
<h2>Contents</h2>
<ul>
<li>
<a href="#agenda">Topics</a>
<ol>
<li><a href="#item01">Convene SWXG WG meeting of
2009-09-02T13:00-15:00Z</a></li>
<li><a href="#item02">General Organization and Task
Forces</a></li>
<li><a href="#item03">User stories</a></li>
</ol>
</li>
<li><a href="#ActionSummary">Summary of Action Items</a></li>
</ul>
<hr />
<div class="meeting">
<p class='phone'>&nbsp;</p>
<p class='phone'>&nbsp;</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>danbri</cite>&gt; hi folks</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>danbri</cite>&gt; i might be irc only
today i'm afraid (drupalcon multitasking)</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; hhalpin did you send
out minutes to approve?</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; low voter turnout</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; looks like the past
minutes are not posted yet?</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>pchampin</cite>&gt; it is :)</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; looks like the
webpage links to minutes are wrong, many link to jul 22</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>pchampin</cite>&gt; the last minutes I
recieved are <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/08/19-swxg-minutes.html">http://www.w3.org/2009/08/19-swxg-minutes.html</a></p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>pchampin</cite>&gt; and the link
sZ works</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>DKA</cite>&gt; <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/07/29-swxg-minutes.html">http://www.w3.org/2009/07/29-swxg-minutes.html</a></p>
<p class='phone'>links to agenda, etc should be OK here -
<a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/Telecons">http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/Telecons</a></p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; Last meeting
minutes are linked from agenda</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/07/29-swxg-minutes.html">http://www.w3.org/2009/07/29-swxg-minutes.html</a></p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; you mean victim</p>
<p class='phone'>I don't mind if nobody else wants to.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; +1 tinkster</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>DKA</cite>&gt; ScribeNick:
tinkster</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>DKA</cite>&gt; Scribe: Toby</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; i saw dan perform
some incantation</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>DKA:</cite> Let's kick off. First item
on our agenda is (as usual) to review last week's minutes.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>bblfish</cite>&gt; hi</p>
<p class='phone'><a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/08/26-swxg-minutes.html">http://www.w3.org/2009/08/26-swxg-minutes.html</a></p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>danbri</cite>&gt; didn't we do
webfinger last week?</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; +1 approve
minutes</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>danbri</cite>&gt; ie. <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/08/26-swxg-minutes.html#item05">http://www.w3.org/2009/08/26-swxg-minutes.html#item05</a></p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>bblfish</cite>&gt; yes, I understood
sparql webfinger right after the end of the conf</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>scribe:</cite> Any objections to
approving last week's minutes?</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; +1 meet again</p>
<h3 id="item01">Convene SWXG WG meeting of
2009-09-02T13:00-15:00Z</h3>
<p class='phone'><cite>scribe:</cite> Moving swiftly on:
general organisations. Still not completed my action on
OSLO/geolocation</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>DKA</cite>&gt; <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/43434/USECASES/results">http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/43434/USECASES/results</a></p>
<p class='phone'><cite>scribe:</cite> Focus today on discussing
use cases and results of poll. Move onto that?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Harry:</cite> that sounds fine.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>melvster</cite>&gt; <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/43434/USECASES/results">http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/43434/USECASES/results</a></p>
<h3 id="item02">General Organization and Task Forces</h3>
<h3 id="item03">User stories</h3>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/43434/USECASES/results">http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/43434/USECASES/results</a></p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Harry:</cite> Most productive to
continue from last meeting, walking through use cases.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>Adam</cite>&gt; <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/43434/USECASES/results?view=compact">
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/43434/USECASES/results?view=compact</a></p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Harry:</cite> Most use cases have a
champion. Some can clearly be dropped - bidirectional; drag and
drop; etc. Some have almost unanimous support. Some more
mixed.</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>DKA:</cite> CRUD is on a much lower
level than the others; can't really be argued against.</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Harry:</cite> Last time we got up to
"Adding new features to Social Networks" case.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/43434/USECASES/results#xq6">http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/43434/USECASES/results#xq6</a></p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; Developers should
be able to expose existing data in new and interesting ways.
But at the same time, people should be made aware of how their
data is being used, and updated when this changes</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Harry:</cite> To me this is talking
mostly about widgets.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; Maybe we should
separate those out</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>DKA:</cite> There's widgets as in
browser-widgets, but also those that live on the page, and
APIs, etc. This encompasses both of those aspects.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; ?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Harry:</cite> should separate out?</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>Yuk</cite>&gt; ??P36 is me</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>DKA:</cite> Not so sure they should be
separate. They seem related.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; The issue with this
usecase is needs a champion</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; i think there should
be an opt in policy about newly added functionality</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; beuler</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>melvster</cite>&gt; I'll champion this
one if no one wants to</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> Anyone want to champion
it?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>DKA:</cite> yay for melvster
championing.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; To find the
original source of a meme or piece of information.</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> Tracking of sources use
case. We want to find the original source of the
information.</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>tinkster:</cite> am happy to champion
this use case.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; i just disagree with
christine</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> Multiple identities /
anonymous identities - merge?</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; To provide
information without being the attributed source or “whistle
blower”.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; Anonymous
information usecase</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; Provenance is
effectivelzy blocked or unknown, i.e. anonymous, or anonymous
identity.</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> this could also be
considered to be merged with source tracking / provenance.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; yeah provenance is an
anonymous node</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>DKA:</cite> curious to understand the
argument against.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; i want to share it,
just not have it attributed to me</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>oshani:</cite> there could be a set of
people you are comfortable with sharing information; other
people not so much; so have two identities - a real one and a
pseudononymous one.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; anonymous could
also be wikileaks-style, i.e. truly anonymous</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>DKA:</cite> Not sure this answers the
whistleblower use case completely anonymously.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; this can be
accomplished technically via messages sent out over mixminion
for example</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; yeah someone on my
street put up a sign saying the water wasnt safe. im sure it
made him a target</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>DKA:</cite> Whistleblower use case more
interesting if we look at it from a gov't agency point of
view.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>bblfish</cite>&gt; what is the problem
with having identifiers for people with no info linked to that
id?</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>bblfish</cite>&gt; then you get id,
and anonymity</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>pchampin</cite>&gt; +1 bblfish</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> if rreck wants to
champion it, we should keep it around, but note its links to
related use cases.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>jsalvachua</cite>&gt; +1 bblfish</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; I think if Ronald
wants to champion if Ronald making sure its suitable,
especially if we can track back to merging source...</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>oshani:</cite> From a social net point
of view, what does this encompass? How does it relate to e.g.
Webcams.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; i want to protect my
friends from something, but i dont want it tracked to me</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> there exists technical
infrastructure that can provide pretty good anonymity.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; i think its null
provenance</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; ill talk to oshani
offline</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> should champions be
rewriting use cases, cleaning up, fleshing out?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>DKA:</cite> yes/</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>melvster</cite>&gt; +1</p><a name=
"action01" id="action01"></a>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt;
<strong>ACTION:</strong> rreck to flesh out anonymous usecase
connecting to multiple identies and null provenance [recorded
in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action01">http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action01</a>]</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>trackbot</cite>&gt; Created ACTION-71
- Flesh out anonymous usecase connecting to multiple identies
and null provenance [on Ronald Reck - due 2009-09-09].</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; "Removing Data or
Changing Data permission" Use-case</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> next use case is
removing data / changing permissions use case. Most people not
in favour of keeping. Perhaps use case is too abstract?</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>bblfish</cite>&gt; there really is not
much text at <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/UserStories#Removing_Data_or_Changing_Data_permission">
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/UserStories#Removing_Data_or_Changing_Data_permission</a></p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> relates to the more
concrete 10 year and takedown cases.<br />
... Merge these three use cases?</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; Document Takedowns
Propagators Use-case</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>Adam</cite>&gt; are all of them really
related to the life cycle management of data?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>DKA:</cite> Seems sensible to me.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; i think all this case
could be solved with obligatory metadata stating time to
life</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> 10 year use case had a
lot of support, no champion. Would oshani like to incorporate
this into document takedown?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>oshani:</cite> yes, I can do that.</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> 10 years is just a
time-related document takedown.</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>bblfish:</cite> if you do everything by
reference (rather than by copying) then you only need to take
down the original.</p><a name="action02" id="action02"></a>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt;
<strong>ACTION:</strong> Oshani to merge document takedown with
time-related takedown "forget this in ten years" and more
general concept of data removal. [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action02">http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action02</a>]</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>trackbot</cite>&gt; Created ACTION-72
- Merge document takedown with time-related takedown "forget
this in ten years" and more general concept of data removal.
[on Oshani Seneviratne - due 2009-09-09].</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>DKA:</cite> example is a photo that I've
taken, which includes bblfish's face, and bblfish annotates it.
Someone else in the photo asked DKA to take down the
photo.<br />
... DKA should be able to remove photo. What happens to
annotation? What is bblfish's right to the image vs DKA's
right?</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; DKA's example
happened to me</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>bblfish:</cite> it's complicated -
that's true.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; "Last Will"
usecase</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> last will and testament
use case.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; time to life for
information</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; obligatory
metadata</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> very popular, but
lacking a champion.<br />
... perhaps should be merged with takedowns? but it's a very
special case.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; i will champion that
but solve it with obligatory metadata</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>MacTed</cite>&gt; everybody's gonna...
:-)</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>DKA:</cite> this is something we'll all
end up facing!</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; +q</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>DKA:</cite> worth keeping on its own.
volunteer champion?</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; Ron?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>MacTed:</cite> this could be solved by
including a time-to-live (TTL) for every piece of content.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; is an option on
time-to-life?</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>bblfish</cite>&gt; yes, but it is
weird. I think that removing information is problematic.</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>everyone:</cite> "if you know the exact
time of your death".</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>MacTed:</cite> copyright is based on
death date.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>Yuk</cite>&gt; it also happens that
one's parents/friends want to see his/her history</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>tinkster:</cite> it's based on the
author's death date, but calculated *after* death.
(currently)</p>
<p class='phone'>Ah, so MacTed above is rreck. (Note to
editor!)</p>
<p class='phone'>(Or maybe not?)</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; Hmmm...it seems
like what we need to do next is move to group permissions</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>Adam</cite>&gt; is some of that
regarding permissions of access versus time of life?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>MacTed:</cite> TTL could be fragmented
by different groups.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; that is an awesome
point, its much more complicated than i had appreciated</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>jsalvachua</cite>&gt; unix like
permissions?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>DKA:</cite> Death use case needs a
champion, even if nobody wants to be the "champion of
death".<br />
... I'd be happy to take it on myself.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; one of my FB passed,
and i wondered what will happen to his page</p><a name=
"action03" id="action03"></a>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt;
<strong>ACTION:</strong> DKA to take on "Last Will and
Testament Usecase", referencing it as both a legal issue and
with regards document takedown [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action03">http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action03</a>]</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>trackbot</cite>&gt; Created ACTION-73
- Take on "Last Will and Testament Usecase", referencing it as
both a legal issue and with regards document takedown [on
Daniel Appelquist - due 2009-09-09].</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>DKA:</cite> What happens right now on
social networks when people die? What happens if someone is
believed dead, their account deleted, and it turns out they're
alive?</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>danbri</cite>&gt; (de-lurking)</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>MacTed</cite>&gt; mostly someone finds
their username/password, and assumes ownership of the account
...</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>tinkster:</cite> there exist facebook
memorial pages (I'm told)</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>danbri</cite>&gt; i'd like to spend
some time chasing up this issue, seems a useful kind of thing
for w3c to investigate</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>MacTed</cite>&gt; if that doesn't
happen, most accounts I've known have just sat there untouched
(sometimes years) like any other inactive</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> multiple identities use
case. champion bblfish?</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; "Multiple
Identities" Use-case</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>Yuk</cite>&gt; Social network for the
dead Respectance crosses the ocean <a href=
"http://thenextweb.com/2008/10/03/social-network-for-the-death-respectance-crosses-the-ocean/">
http://thenextweb.com/2008/10/03/social-network-for-the-death-respectance-crosses-the-ocean/</a></p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; Sort of built from
multiple identities over multiple networks to metadata about
the management of data over multiple networks to access
control.</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> Maybe this could be the
starting point for other use cases.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>MacTed</cite>&gt; demerits for me, I
found no window to review/restructure :-(</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> e.g. identities on
mutiple networks.</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>bblfish:</cite> Multiple identities
seems like a good idea - easy to do.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; acceptable use is a
problem, i dont think FB let's you do it</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> Could you maybe merge
this with no-password use case?</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; "Using a web
service should not involve password or account name creation"
Use-case</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; but these seem
kinda of technically separate</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; so keep them
separate?</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; tons of cross
talk</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>bblfish:</cite> the user not needing to
have a password doesn't mean they can't identify themselves.
It's a question of ease-of-use. A bit technical.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>Adam</cite>&gt; no</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>Adam</cite>&gt; think its henrys
line</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>bblfish:</cite> repeated setting up of
accounts is unnecessary and tedious.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; are we losing
bblfish?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>bblfish:</cite> data portability
problem?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> so bblfish wants to keep
multiple identities and passwordless use cases separate?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>bblfish:</cite> yes. latter is about
ease of use.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>MacTed</cite>&gt; sounds like
OpenID?</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>jsalvachua</cite>&gt; sorry have to
leave, see you.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; tough to hear
agreed</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>bblfish</cite>&gt; another use case
that this makes me think of is: Identifiers on SN should not be
resold to other people, as this would mess up the web of
relations on the web. Eg: people saying they are firends of
<a href=
"http://facebook.org/joe#me">http://facebook.org/joe#me</a> and
then this being reassinged to Joe BadGuy</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>DKA:</cite> problem with zakim<br />
... let's move on; for now Henry as champion for multiple
identities.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; yes better</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>bblfish</cite>&gt; yes, the point is
that the DataPortability group have mentioned that loggin in to
every web site is a big problem</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>bblfish</cite>&gt; This is solved by
OpenId, Passport, foaf+ssl</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> next use cases are all
about group access control.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>bblfish</cite>&gt; the data
portability video: <a href=
"http://blogs.sun.com/bblfish/entry/data_portability_the_video">
http://blogs.sun.com/bblfish/entry/data_portability_the_video</a></p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> first is more abstract;
second is the concrete example of family-access for a
resource.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; agreed kinship is
cultural</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> Most comments suggest
merging these.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; Distributed Group
Access Control" Use-case</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>MacTed</cite>&gt; hm.</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>DKA:</cite> who would agree on what a
family is? link identity to genome?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> who will champion
this/these use cases?</p><a name="action04" id="action04"></a>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt;
<strong>ACTION:</strong> bblfish to merge Family and Group
access usecases [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action04">http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action04</a>]</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>trackbot</cite>&gt; Created ACTION-74
- Merge Family and Group access usecases [on Henry Story - due
2009-09-09].</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>bblfish:</cite> yes, I'm championing
this. Don't need to link in genome (scribe notes that FOAF does
have an appropriate property) - just need to link to your
family.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; Intransitivity of
Policies Applied to Social Network Data" Use-cas</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; but family markedness
is cultural</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> intransitivity use
case.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; some cultures mark
siblings but not gender</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>danbri</cite>&gt; (tinkster - new foaf
properties can be had for as little as 5 euros... send me mail
:)</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; Current social
networking platforms implement very rudimentary data usage
policies. These mostly focuses on the immediate individuals
concerned and do not have much consideration about the data
transfer beyond them. Policy conflicts are also not properly
handled. If the policies applied to social networking data are
made to be transitive, we can make sure tha</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> if your data moves from
one SN to another, your privacy policy can accompany it.</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>oshani:</cite> facebook quizzes - I'm
not just giving out my own data, but my friends' data. This is
a problem.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; yeah that is a
problem</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>danbri</cite>&gt; (ah, i read
"doesn't" :)</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>danbri</cite>&gt; (yeah, dnachecksum
started as a joke, but i think a few folk would like a real
one!)</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>Yuk</cite>&gt; can the friends choose
not to have their data being taken from one website to
another?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>DKA:</cite> oshani, could you find a
link to quizzes example?</p><a name="action05" id=
"action05"></a>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt;
<strong>ACTION:</strong> oshani to flesh out "Intransitivity of
Policies Applied to Social Network Data" [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action05">http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action05</a>]</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>trackbot</cite>&gt; Created ACTION-75
- Flesh out "Intransitivity of Policies Applied to Social
Network Data" [on Oshani Seneviratne - due 2009-09-09].</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> bidirectional use case -
everyone agreed to drop it. too vague?</p><a name="action06"
id="action06"></a>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt;
<strong>ACTION:</strong> hhalpin to drop bidirectional use case
[recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action06">http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action06</a>]</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>trackbot</cite>&gt; Created ACTION-76
- Drop bidirectional use case [on Harry Halpin - due
2009-09-09].</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; peer pressure</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> virtual private
organisation use case - create a temporary internal (or
cross-organisation) network.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; "Virtual Private
Organization" Use-case</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; No champion</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> make sure it doesn't
leak data.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; I thought it came
from joaquin...</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>DKA:</cite> Isn't this the corporate SN
use case?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> related to that
heavily.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>bblfish</cite>&gt; I suppose this is
also very similar to "Distributed Group Access Control"</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; it is very similar
to distributed group access contol.</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Adam:</cite> I can champion this use
case. Can look at this two ways - internally, people could
create their own groups, which they could make private (even
within the company) or not.<br />
... Or is this more complicated.</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>DKA:</cite> It's pretty bare-bones right
now. It seems to point more to organically-growing
networks.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>pchampin</cite>&gt; sorry, I have to
leave</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; groove does what you
are describing</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; take care
pchampin!</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Adam:</cite> if you were to create one
of these private virtual organisations, people would need to
agree to its terms. Right now, our IT dept can create private
organisations like this, and use the group to post some
specific public content too.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; maybe add links to
Distributed Access control?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>DKA:</cite> Can you add this as a
sub-usecase?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>tinkster:</cite> if what Adam describes
could also take in people and departments at other
organisations too.</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>bblfish:</cite> related to distributed
access control, which would be an enabling technology for
it.</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>DKA:</cite> we're at the end of our
slot.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; we did pretty well
getting through them</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; bye DKA</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> three more use cases to
go through. Should we go through them now?</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; so keep geo is
clear</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>bblfish</cite>&gt; +1 for talking
about these now</p>
<p class='phone'>+1</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>oshani</cite>&gt; +1</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>melvster</cite>&gt; +1</p><a name=
"action07" id="action07"></a>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt;
<strong>ACTION:</strong> Adam to work on fleshing on "Virtual
Private Organisation Use Case" reference distributed data
access control policy [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action07">http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action07</a>]</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>trackbot</cite>&gt; Created ACTION-77
- Work on fleshing on "Virtual Private Organisation Use Case"
reference distributed data access control policy [on Adam Boyet
- due 2009-09-09].</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>bblfish</cite>&gt; did we doo the Too
Many Channels?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> geo use case. Inferences
on location-based contextual data. We should have privacy
controls on this, but should be able to share it if we want.
Relates to portability and access control.</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>oshani:</cite> happy to champion this.
can't see anything to merge with.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; "Too many channels"
can be move across different channels</p><a name="action08" id=
"action08"></a>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt;
<strong>ACTION:</strong> hhalpin to drop "too many channels"
[recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action08">http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action08</a>]</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> "too many channels" use
case - allow data to move across between different SNs. Pretty
much covered by other portability and access use cases. We
should drop.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>trackbot</cite>&gt; Created ACTION-78
- Drop "too many channels" [on Harry Halpin - due
2009-09-09].</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> Data protection use
case. This is not easy.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>oshani</cite>&gt; hhalpin, nope, I am
not a champion for that</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>bblfish:</cite> the question is very
interesting, but I don't know what the answer is.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; Alice is not a
member of a given walled-garden social network and Bob tags her
in an image from an event they were both at. Given that Alice
finds out about this image, through word of mouth or by
whatever means, should she be able to ask for her depiction to
be removed? If she somehow manages to confirm that indeed it
was a picture of her, should she be abl</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> similar to document
takedown perhaps, but also need to look at legal
requirements.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>oshani</cite>&gt; I think I am</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>Adam</cite>&gt; data protection to me
infers controlled access</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; controlled
access</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; Could be kept
separate there...</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>Adam</cite>&gt; is this use case more
about Alice's right to have the image removed?</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>bblfish</cite>&gt; Could be an intro
to a number of use cases</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>oshani:</cite> this is different fron
document take down in that it's initiated by an outsider.</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> perhaps it needs a bit
of rephrasing.</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>bblfish:</cite> I'll think about
that.</p><a name="action09" id="action09"></a>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt;
<strong>ACTION:</strong> bblfish to relabel data protection use
case to be about controlled access and takedown to data "about"
you [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action09">http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action09</a>]</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>trackbot</cite>&gt; Created ACTION-79
- Relabel data protection use case to be about controlled
access and takedown to data "about" you [on Henry Story - due
2009-09-09].</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; +1 yeah</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>bblfish</cite>&gt; we have a few extra
use cases that were added</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> I think we've managed to
drop three use cases and merge about four.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; what about the shill
one? can we keep it</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> Next week after a bit
more boiling down, we can maybe freeze the use cases and start
drafting a full document.<br />
... Document structure maybe: identity, metadata, access?</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; do you know who
added that one?</p>
<p class='phone'>I think I might have added one - commercial
incentives for social networks to open their data.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>bblfish</cite>&gt; <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/UserStories#Social_Web_for_Business_Intelligence">
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/UserStories#Social_Web_for_Business_Intelligence</a></p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>Adam</cite>&gt; yeah, toby did and
there was one other as well</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>bblfish</cite>&gt; this one
perhaps?</p>
<p class='phone'>There was bblfish's plastic toy one too.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>oshani</cite>&gt; <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/UserStories#Current_Location_as_a_Direction">
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/UserStories#Current_Location_as_a_Direction</a></p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; hhalpin: i added
shill</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>Adam</cite>&gt; i'm happy to champion
the Social Web for Business Intellegence</p>
<p class='phone'>Not realy.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>bblfish</cite>&gt; was this one new
too <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/UserStories#Shills_Posting_False_Information_to_Dilute_the_Truth">
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/UserStories#Shills_Posting_False_Information_to_Dilute_the_Truth</a></p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; OK.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; oshani and
henry</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>tinkster:</cite> I don't have any
special interest in the use case I've recently posted - just
wrote it up as I'd been actioned. Someone else can
champion.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>bblfish</cite>&gt; yes, I can do
that.</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> bblfish and oshani to
edit full use case document?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>oshani:</cite> happy to help.</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>bblfish:</cite> not edited a w3c doc
before.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>bblfish</cite>&gt; don't think I did
edit a doc</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>bblfish</cite>&gt; apart from wiki</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> I'll show you the
process next week. Draft it on Wiki; cut out HTML and put it on
CVS; then edit it from there.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>bblfish</cite>&gt; ok</p><a name=
"action10" id="action10"></a>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt;
<strong>ACTION:</strong> Explain to henry and oshani doc
editing process for usecases [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action10">http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action10</a>]</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>trackbot</cite>&gt; Sorry, couldn't
find user - Explain</p><a name="action11" id="action11"></a>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt;
<strong>ACTION:</strong> hhalpin explain to henry and oshani
doc editing process for usecases [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action11">http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action11</a>]</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>trackbot</cite>&gt; Created ACTION-80
- Explain to henry and oshani doc editing process for usecases
[on Harry Halpin - due 2009-09-09].</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> that's all folks.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; Meeting
adjourned</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; bubye</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> sorry for
overrunning.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>bblfish</cite>&gt; ok by</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; i wont be here next
week.</p>
<p class='irc'>&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; trackbot, end
meeting</p>
</div>
<h2><a name="ActionSummary" id="ActionSummary">Summary of Action
Items</a></h2><!-- Action Items -->
<strong>[NEW]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> Adam to work on
fleshing on "Virtual Private Organisation Use Case" reference
distributed data access control policy [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action07">http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action07</a>]<br />
<strong>[NEW]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> bblfish to merge
Family and Group access usecases [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action04">http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action04</a>]<br />
<strong>[NEW]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> bblfish to
relabel data protection use case to be about controlled access
and takedown to data "about" you [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action09">http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action09</a>]<br />
<strong>[NEW]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> DKA to take on
"Last Will and Testament Usecase", referencing it as both a legal
issue and with regards document takedown [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action03">http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action03</a>]<br />
<strong>[NEW]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> hhalpin explain
to henry and oshani doc editing process for usecases [recorded in
<a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action11">http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action11</a>]<br />
<strong>[NEW]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> hhalpin to drop
"too many channels" [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action08">http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action08</a>]<br />
<strong>[NEW]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> hhalpin to drop
bidirectional use case [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action06">http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action06</a>]<br />
<strong>[NEW]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> oshani to flesh
out "Intransitivity of Policies Applied to Social Network Data"
[recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action05">http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action05</a>]<br />
<strong>[NEW]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> Oshani to merge
document takedown with time-related takedown "forget this in ten
years" and more general concept of data removal. [recorded in
<a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action02">http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action02</a>]<br />
<strong>[NEW]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> rreck to flesh
out anonymous usecase connecting to multiple identies and null
provenance [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action01">http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-swxg-minutes.html#action01</a>]<br />
&nbsp;<br />
[End of minutes]<br />
<hr />
<address>
Minutes formatted by David Booth's <a href=
"http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm">
scribe.perl</a> version 1.135 (<a href=
"http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/">CVS log</a>)<br />
$Date: 2009/09/09 09:25:22 $
</address>
</body>
</html>