Another abandoned server code base... this is kind of an ancestor of taskrambler.
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
 
 
 
 
 
 

213 lines
16 KiB

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en">
<head>
<meta name="generator" content="HTML Tidy for Linux/x86 (vers 12 April 2005), see www.w3.org"/>
<title>Media Annotations WG -- 07 Oct 2008</title>
<link type="text/css" rel="STYLESHEET" href="http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/base.css"/>
<link type="text/css" rel="STYLESHEET" href="http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/public.css"/>
<link type="text/css" rel="STYLESHEET" href="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/minutes-style.css"/>
<meta content="Media Annotations WG" name="Title"/>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"/>
</head>
<body><p><a href="http://www.w3.org/"><img src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/w3c_home" alt="W3C"
border="0" height="48" width="72"/></a></p><h1>Media Annotations
WG</h1><h2>07 Oct 2008</h2><p><a
href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2008Oct/0017.html">
Agenda</a></p><p>See also: <a href="http://www.w3.org/2008/10/07-mediaann-irc">IRC
log</a></p><h2><a name="attendees" id="attendees">Attendees</a></h2><div class="intro">
<dl>
<dt>Present</dt>
<dd>Davy, Werner, Felix, Daniel, raphael, Joakim, Thierry, Vassilis, Frank, Hui</dd>
<dt>Regrets</dt>
<dd>Tobias, Erik</dd>
<dt>Chair</dt>
<dd>Daniel</dd>
<dt>Scribe</dt>
<dd>wbailer, Werner</dd>
</dl>
</div><h2>Contents</h2><ul>
<li>
<a href="#agenda">Topics</a>
<ol>
<li><a href="#item01">approval of previous minutes</a></li>
<li><a href="#item02">next scribe</a></li>
<li><a href="#item03">future telecon / f2f</a></li>
<li><a href="#item04">action items</a></li>
<li><a href="#item05">editing</a></li>
<li><a href="#item06">open issues</a></li>
<li><a href="#item07">Use cases to be derived from the thread "Elaborating on the Video
use case"</a></li>
<li><a href="#item08">use cases from issues list</a></li>
</ol></li>
<li><a href="#ActionSummary">Summary of Action Items</a></li>
</ul><hr/><div class="meeting"><p class="irc">&lt;<cite>spark3</cite>&gt; Hi Werner, thanks to
take a minutes today</p><h3 id="item01">approval of previous minutes</h3><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>spark3</cite>&gt;
<a href="http://www.w3.org/2008/09/30-mediaann-minutes.html"
>http://www.w3.org/2008/09/30-mediaann-minutes.html</a></p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; +1 for accepting the minutes</p><p class="phone"
><cite>Thierry:</cite> self introduction</p><p class="phone">Thierry will be alternate
staff contact</p><p class="irc">&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; Thierry is alternate team
contact for the Media Frag WG too</p><h3 id="item02">next scribe</h3><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>vassilis</cite>&gt; I am connecting now</p><h3 id="item03">future telecon /
f2f</h3><p class="phone">f2f at tpac: 23-24 Oct</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; it is a wrong copy paste from the Media Frag WG :-)</p><p
class="irc">&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; correct dates for this WG is indeed: 23-24/10</p><p
class="phone">2nd f2f 9-10 dec</p><p class="irc">&lt;<cite>fsasaki</cite>&gt; I take
responsibility for this ;)</p><p class="phone">next telecon: 14. October, 21:00 UTC</p><p
class="phone">felix and daniel will make draft of agenda for f2f available until next
week</p><p class="phone"><cite>daniel:</cite> joint meeting with media fragments?</p><h3
id="item04">action items</h3><p class="phone"><cite>raphael:</cite> possible to attend both
WGs f2f meetings at tpac</p><p class="irc">&lt;<cite>fsasaki</cite>&gt; +1 to raphael</p><a
name="action01" id="action01"/>
<p class="irc">&lt;<cite>scribe</cite>&gt;
<strong>ACTION:</strong> Check WG participant mailing list subscription mechanism to make
sure that new participants are subscribed automatically [recorded in <a
href="http://www.w3.org/2008/10/07-mediaann-minutes.html#action01"
>http://www.w3.org/2008/10/07-mediaann-minutes.html#action01</a>]</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>trackbot</cite>&gt; Sorry, couldn't find user - Check</p><p class="phone"
>action-6 continues</p><p class="phone">ACTION-7 done</p><p class="phone">ACTION-9
done</p><p class="phone">ACTION-10 closed</p><p class="irc">&lt;<cite>trackbot</cite>&gt;
ACTION-10 Will work on 6084 and 6086 closed</p><p class="phone">ACTION-11 closed</p><p
class="irc">&lt;<cite>fsasaki</cite>&gt; close ACTION-7</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>trackbot</cite>&gt; ACTION-11 Create information in wiki about 6067 closed</p><p
class="irc">&lt;<cite>trackbot</cite>&gt; ACTION-7 Describe mobile aspects to use cases
closed</p><p class="irc">&lt;<cite>fsasaki</cite>&gt; close ACTION-8</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>trackbot</cite>&gt; ACTION-8 Put XG use cases into wiki closed</p><p
class="phone">ACTION-12 closed</p><p class="irc">&lt;<cite>trackbot</cite>&gt; ACTION-12
(placeholder for dave) to elaborate 6066 closed</p><p class="phone">ACTION-13 closed</p><p
class="irc">&lt;<cite>trackbot</cite>&gt; ACTION-13 (placeholder for dave) to work on 6113
closed</p><h3 id="item05">editing</h3><p class="phone"><cite>daniel:</cite> still looking
for volunteers</p><p class="irc">&lt;<cite>thierry</cite>&gt; Do we plan to have miulti
editors, for multi chapters in the spec ?</p><p class="irc">&lt;<cite>thierry</cite>&gt; Or
just one document with one or multi editors</p><p class="phone"><cite>daniel:</cite> editing
team for all wg deliverables</p><h3 id="item06">open issues</h3><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>fsasaki</cite>&gt; see <a
href="http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/42786/formats/results"
>http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/42786/formats/results</a> for results of 6054</p><p
class="phone"><cite>daniel:</cite> going through status of open issues</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>spark3</cite>&gt; open issue 6065 ?</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>fsasaki</cite>&gt; 6065 looks like fitting to Use case "Services by using an
unified media annotation"</p><p class="irc">&lt;<cite>spark3</cite>&gt; is it a use case as
it is ?</p><p class="phone"><cite>joakim:</cite> wrote about video case, could be merged
into services uc</p><p class="irc">&lt;<cite>fsasaki</cite>&gt; +1 to Joakim</p><p
class="phone"><cite>joakim:</cite> not sure to merge iptv with video use case</p><p
class="irc">&lt;<cite>frank</cite>&gt; +1 join with video</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>vassilis</cite>&gt; +1 join with video</p><p class="phone">agreed on merge iptv
with services use case</p><p class="phone">issue 6083: mm search?</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>spark3</cite>&gt; use case 6083 multimedia search ?</p><p class="phone">it's
partly covered by 6067</p><p class="irc">&lt;<cite>fsasaki</cite>&gt; 6083 was proposed from
erik <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2008Sep/0025.html"
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2008Sep/0025.html</a></p><p
class="irc">&lt;<cite>frank</cite>&gt; it seems to me that 6083 is one of the basic actions
- like adaptation and presentation, that will show up in a few use cases</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>spark3</cite>&gt; we should drop use case 6083 ?</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>frank</cite>&gt; Would we need to blacks =&gt; basic and applied</p><p
class="phone"><cite>felix:</cite> keep general use cases that overlap with more specific
ones</p><p class="irc">&lt;<cite>frank</cite>&gt; I agree on that</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>davy</cite>&gt; +1</p><p class="irc">&lt;<cite>frank</cite>&gt; but perhaps
grouping them</p><p class="phone"><cite>vassilis:</cite> important and general, vague, agree
to keep it</p><p class="irc">&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; +1 for felix: these are dimensions
through you can see the use cases; one dimension is the media (image, video, audio), another
dimension is the use of the annotation (presentation, adaptation, search)</p><p
class="phone">6083 will be kept</p><p class="irc">&lt;<cite>fsasaki</cite>&gt; I agree with
vassilis and raphael</p><p class="phone">6085: keep mm sharing use case?</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>spark3</cite>&gt; 6085 keep or drop ?</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>frank</cite>&gt; same a s search, I think, so keep it for the tie being</p><p
class="phone"><cite>felix:</cite> same as search, keep it</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>spark3</cite>&gt; 6112 is done</p><p class="phone">6112: done</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>fsasaki</cite>&gt;
<a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2008Sep/0053.html">
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2008Sep/0053.html</a></p><p
class="phone">6112: template + call for contributions from outside wg</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; +1</p><p class="irc">&lt;<cite>frank</cite>&gt; +1</p><p
class="irc">&lt;<cite>spark3</cite>&gt; 6126 Machine readable license data (no text)</p><p
class="irc">&lt;<cite>spark3</cite>&gt; use case or drop it ?</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>fsasaki</cite>&gt; Felix: we can prepare the template later, e.g. after the
first WD</p><p class="irc">&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; I did mention the template from the
SWD WG: <a href="http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/UCFormat"
>http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/UCFormat</a></p><p class="phone"><cite>felix:</cite>
(6112) prepare template for UCs/requirements now?</p><p class="phone"><cite>daniel:</cite>
prepare later</p><p class="phone">issue 6126, keep or drop?</p><p class="phone"
><cite>felix:</cite> detailed definition of license data beyond scope, just slots for
plugging in license information</p><p class="irc">&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; Post on the
mailing list go in the same direction that what Felix said</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>spark3</cite>&gt; keep use case 6126. any opinion ?</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>frank</cite>&gt; If we decide for a slot then we can drop it</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; +1 for dropping and agreeing to put a placeholder</p><p
class="irc">&lt;<cite>fsasaki</cite>&gt; +1 to rapahel</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>vassilis</cite>&gt; +1</p><p class="irc">&lt;<cite>davy</cite>&gt; +1</p><p
class="irc">&lt;<cite>hmiao</cite>&gt; +1 to rapahel</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>cgi-irc</cite>&gt; +1</p><p class="phone">issue 6126 will be dropped and we will
have just a placeholder for machine readable license data</p><p class="phone"
><cite>daniel:</cite> feel free to contribute to wiki</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>spark3</cite>&gt;
<a
href="http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/Main_Page#Use_Cases__and_Requirements"
>
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/Main_Page#Use_Cases__and_Requirements</a></p><p
class="irc">&lt;<cite>fsasaki</cite>&gt;
<a href="http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/Use_Cases_&amp;_Requirements">
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/Use_Cases_&amp;_Requirements</a></p><p
class="phone"><cite>felix:</cite> updated main page, use cases on separate page</p><h3
id="item07">Use cases to be derived from the thread "Elaborating on the Video use
case"</h3><p class="phone"><cite>joakim:</cite> included in services uc or not?</p><p
class="phone"><cite>felix:</cite> looked at Microsoft Interactive Media Manager documents,
did not find link to ontology</p><p class="phone"><cite>joakim:</cite> has some info
locally, will post to list</p><p class="irc">&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; Joakim, can you
post the ontology to the list? is it publicly available ?</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>spark3</cite>&gt; new use case "Video"</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>spark3</cite>&gt; new use case "Video" ? any opinion ?</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>frank</cite>&gt; +1</p><p class="irc">&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; Like Felix
said, I made a case for having structured annotations</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; The WG will design an abstract model, but at some point, needs
to vote for a format for representing this model</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt; I would favor RDF</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>fsasaki</cite>&gt; +1 to RDF</p><p class="phone"><cite>daniel:</cite> create new
use case "video"</p><a name="action02" id="action02"/>
<p class="irc">&lt;<cite>scribe</cite>&gt;
<strong>ACTION:</strong> joakim to add text on video uc [recorded in <a
href="http://www.w3.org/2008/10/07-mediaann-minutes.html#action02"
>http://www.w3.org/2008/10/07-mediaann-minutes.html#action02</a>]</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>trackbot</cite>&gt; Created ACTION-14 - Add text on video uc [on Joakim
Söderberg - due 2008-10-14].</p><p class="irc">&lt;<cite>raphael</cite>&gt;
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/t/annotations_about"
>http://www.youtube.com/t/annotations_about</a></p><p class="phone"><cite>raphael:</cite>
announcement from youtube for annotation support</p><p class="phone"><cite>daniel:</cite>
also create uc from mobile?</p><a name="action03" id="action03"/>
<p class="irc">&lt;<cite>scribe</cite>&gt;
<strong>ACTION:</strong> joakim to elaborate on mobile uc [recorded in <a
href="http://www.w3.org/2008/10/07-mediaann-minutes.html#action03"
>http://www.w3.org/2008/10/07-mediaann-minutes.html#action03</a>]</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>trackbot</cite>&gt; Created ACTION-15 - Elaborate on mobile uc [on Joakim
Söderberg - due 2008-10-14].</p><h3 id="item08">use cases from issues list</h3><p
class="phone">??: service use case - generalise?</p><p class="phone"><cite>felix:</cite>
does a specific uc have effect on ontology or api?</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>VeroniqueM</cite>&gt; would it be relevant to separate a list of tasks, that need
models, and use cases that group different tasks?</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>fsasaki</cite>&gt; felix: maybe keep in mind when you produce a use case /
requirement if it has an effect on the ontology or the API</p><p class="phone"
><cite>daniel:</cite> ALL: add to requirements list</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>spark3</cite>&gt; thanks all and bye - Daniel</p><p class="irc"
>&lt;<cite>fsasaki</cite>&gt; thanks werner for scribing</p></div><h2><a
name="ActionSummary" id="ActionSummary">Summary of Action
Items</a></h2><!-- Action Items -->
<strong>[NEW]</strong>
<strong>ACTION:</strong> Check WG participant mailing list subscription mechanism to make sure
that new participants are subscribed automatically [recorded in <a
href="http://www.w3.org/2008/10/07-mediaann-minutes.html#action01"
>http://www.w3.org/2008/10/07-mediaann-minutes.html#action01</a>]<br/>
<strong>[NEW]</strong>
<strong>ACTION:</strong> joakim to add text on video uc [recorded in <a
href="http://www.w3.org/2008/10/07-mediaann-minutes.html#action02"
>http://www.w3.org/2008/10/07-mediaann-minutes.html#action02</a>]<br/>
<strong>[NEW]</strong>
<strong>ACTION:</strong> joakim to elaborate on mobile uc [recorded in <a
href="http://www.w3.org/2008/10/07-mediaann-minutes.html#action03"
>http://www.w3.org/2008/10/07-mediaann-minutes.html#action03</a>]<br/> &nbsp;<br/> [End of
minutes]<br/><hr/><address> Minutes formatted by David Booth's <a
href="http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm"> scribe.perl</a>
version 1.133 (<a href="http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/">CVS log</a>)<br/> $Date:
2008/10/07 14:02:06 $ </address></body>
</html>