HTTP Current Status
This page summarizes the relationships among specifications, whether they are finished standards or drafts. Below, each title
links to the most recent version of a document.
For related introductory information, see: Privacy, Protocols, Protocols.
Drafts
Below are draft documents:
other Working Drafts.
Some of these may become Web Standards through the W3C Recommendation Track
process. Others may be published as Group Notes or
become obsolete specifications.
Other Working Drafts
|
2011-11-14
|
This specification defines the technical mechanisms for expressing a cross-site tracking preference and mechanisms for sites to signal whether and how they honor this preference.
|
|
2011-11-14
|
This specification defines the meaning of a Do Not Track preference and sets out practices for websites to comply with this preference.
|
|
2011-10-20
|
This specification defines an API for opening an HTTP connection for receiving push notifications from a server in the form of DOM events.
|
|
2011-05-10
|
The identification of resources on the Web by URI alone may not be sufficient, as other factors such as HTTP content negotiation might come into play. This issue is particularly significant for quality assurance testing, conformance claims, and reporting languages like the W3C Evaluation And Report Language (EARL). This document provides a representation of the HTTP vocabulary in RDF, to allow quality assurance tools to record the HTTP headers that have been exchanged between a client and a server. The RDF terms defined by this document represent the core HTTP specification defined by RFC 2616, as well as additional HTTP headers registered by IANA. These terms can also be used to record HTTPS exchanges.
|
|
2011-05-10
|
This document is a specification for a vocabulary to represent Content in RDF. This vocabulary is intended to provide a flexible framework within different usage scenarios to semantically represent any type of content, be it on the Web or in local storage media. For example, it can be used by Web accessibility evaluation tools to record a representation of the assessed Web content in an Evaluation And Report Language (EARL) 1.0 Schema evaluation report. The document contains introductory information on its usage and some examples.
|
Obsolete Specifications
These specifications have either been superseded by others,
or have been abandoned. They remain available for archival
purposes, but are not intended to be used.
Retired
|
1998-07-10
|
This is a sample short description for this specification;
over time we will replace this description with a real one.
|
|
1998-07-10
|
This is a sample short description for this specification;
over time we will replace this description with a real one.
|
|
1998-07-10
|
This is a sample short description for this specification;
over time we will replace this description with a real one.
|
|
1998-07-10
|
This document defines the experimental multiplexing protocol
referred to as "SMUX". SMUX is a session management protocol
separating the underlying transport from the upper level
application protocols. It provides a lightweight communication
channel to the application layer by multiplexing data streams on
top of a reliable stream oriented transport. By supporting
coexistence of multiple application level protocols (e.g. HTTP and
HTTP/NG), SMUX should ease transitions to future Web protocols, and
communications of client applets using private protocols with
servers over the same TCP connection as the HTTP conversation.
|
|
1998-07-10
|
This is a sample short description for this specification;
over time we will replace this description with a real one.
|
|
1998-03-27
|
This is a sample short description for this specification;
over time we will replace this description with a real one.
|
|
1997-11-21
|
This is a sample short description for this specification;
over time we will replace this description with a real one.
|
|
1997-01-06
|
This is a sample short description for this specification;
over time we will replace this description with a real one.
|
|
1996-03-07
|
The Common Gateway
Interface (CGI) is not scaling to meet the requirements of
today's dynamic, interactive webs. For this reason, multiple
vendors have proposed C callable APIs. These APIs allow authors to
alleviate the performance penalty of CGI, and allow tighter
integration of add-in modules. Unfortunately, this comes at the
price of complexity and portability.
This document describes a new model for extending WWW servers.
First, HTTP is captured using an interface
specification, which eliminates the ambiguities of
interpretating a standards-track document. This interface is then
implemented atop a particular httpd's API. Finally, all of this is
done using a standard distributed object model called ILU.
Digital Creations' work on our ILU
Requester reflects this design and shows its advantages.
This paper describes the ILU Requester.
|